Redoing Assesments

I did redo the assessments of each source in my comment, but i guess it would be easier just to create another post

I totally misread what we had to do, i thought we were supposed to comment on them, not asses them
1. http://chronicle.com/wiredcampus/article/3645/nude-student-photos-stolen-from-facebook-by-college-it-administrator-police-charge
This is an authoritative source. It backs up claims with evidence that is credible and comes directly from the facebook site.

2. http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/12778
this post could go either way. On one had it is a blog, so its not credible, but then again the author backs up his claims with sources

3. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/17/technology/internet/17facebook.html?_r=1
This is an authoritative source. Not only is it a credible source, It uses direct quotes of zuckerburg and other high end facebook staff to help prove their point, along with direct links and quotes to facebooks terms of service, not only that, but there are other quotes from the advocacy group Consumers Unionand the blog Consumerist cited them which helped to explain what the terms of service meant to them